Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

The black science and technology system of Xueba is the 441th chapter of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. If it can really solve the problem of controllable nuclear fusion, a research institute is really nothing, even more exaggerated treatment can be considered. .

After all, Huaguo is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of international cutting-edge talents is always one of the priorities of talent work.

And do not care about the reaction of domestic academic circles.

As the distance is getting closer, the name of Lu Zhou is not only the physics field, but the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in Stockholm is also a headache for this name.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences is located in a quiet corner of the Institute building.

Olof Ramström, who had just concluded an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk and looking at the paper in his hand.

"Physics? The scope of your involvement is really wide." After seeing the papers in the hands of Tong Yu, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and was very interested.

"I am not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I have heard several professors discussing it, so I went to the acquaintances I knew to help me get a copy."

For the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, Olof must not understand, after all, the profession is not correct.

But this does not prevent him from combining the hand, refer to the professional's comments, to understand where the paper is outstanding, or to solve the problem that has plagued the physics community for many years.

Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"

"Yes, this is a headache," paused for a moment, and Olof continued in a joking tone. "I don't know if we can see him at the Nobel Prize in Physics next year."

Olof Ramström is a professor of machine chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and a member of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the 18-year Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

Peter Brzezinski, who is standing next to him, is a big cow in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also a member of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

In the past month, the name Lu Zhou almost contracted more than half of the Nobel Committee's controversy, so that they had opened several meetings and did not reach a consensus on the issue.

More interestingly, the focus of those debates is not on the results of the participation in the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the problem of lithium negative dendrites, they are quite level research results.

Moreover, it is not just an application area.

Just last year, he established the "theoretical model of electrochemical interface structure", which caused a lot of sensation in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and won the Hoffman Medal.

However, the Nobel Prize is not a general honor after all. What needs to be considered is not just a certain aspect or a problem in a certain field.

It is true that he has made very good results, but the results are equally good but still in line.

Many people have not even selected the team that has been in the queue for decades. Some people have even been ranked from the prime of the year to the land.

There are great differences in the opinions of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Some people think that he and his research are too young, but some people think that youngness cannot be a reason to ignore the importance of the results.

For example, Professor Oloff is one of the pros who agrees with the latter.

In his view, the modification of pdms materials and hcs-1 may still be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they still do not reach a prominent level in terms of the contribution of the chemical field. However, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure, in his view, has undoubtedly reached a prominent level.

In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he has established.

It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the discipline of surface chemistry and has opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.

“The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to the cryo-electron microscope. The 15-year award-winning DNA repair mechanism study is even what the Karolinska Institute should consider. Seriously, if we don’t consider the true chemistry anymore. The results, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry, can be renamed the Bio Awards Jury."

Hearing this sentence, Professor Peter, who is engaged in the direction of biochemistry, coughed a little.

"Don't be my friend, biochemistry is also part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy is not a complete result of biology. Can it be considered a methodological study in analytical chemistry?"

Olof shook his head. "This word game doesn't make any sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."

Someone has done a very interesting statistic. In the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the Nobel Prize gives the most to the polymer and biochemistry, even a proportion of one-third, of which biochemistry has 26 chemistry. The award was given to structural biology six times.

In contrast, the organic synthesis methodology has only been awarded 12 times in the true sense, and inorganic chemistry is even worse...

If you think of dna as a big molecule, then the choice of the Nobel Committee is really not a problem, and it can be logically justified.

However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.

After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is the place where biologists should go.

Now even the cryo-electron microscope has won the prize. It is impossible to say that the chemists have no opinion at all.

Looking at his old friend, Peter sighed softly.

"I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is really outstanding. The Berlin report was not seen at the scene, but afterwards it was exchanged with many professors of the Max Planck Institute, and their views were not The exception is very high... but what I have to say is that the result is too young."

Olof retorted: "What does it matter? When we award the design and synthesis of molecular machines, is it different from the contribution that this technology can make in the future?"

"So the awards were indeed controversial and many people’s expectations. But what we are saying is not the focus. The key to the problem is that he is too young," Professor Peter shook his head. "24-year-old nominee." ... If the Nobel Prize is awarded to him, there is no doubt that he will be the youngest winner."

Prior to this, the youngest Nobel laureate was 25-year-old Lawrence Prague.

Although Nobel’s widow does not specify how many years the winner must be older, not everyone is happy to break the rules and set a record in history.

Unless he is really good.

However, this subjective problem is quite difficult to judge, unless the scholars who have the surface chemistry direction in the Nobel Prize Committee can better describe his work in an objective way...

But unfortunately, among these members, there are no scholars who study the direction of surface chemistry.

In fact, Oloff himself is very hesitant, and he insists on it right.

But he just felt that this Nobel Prize should consider purely chemistry work.

Or in other words, they should award the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure.

After all, in the 21st century, it is too difficult to make such an important result in the field of theoretical chemistry...